<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TO AVOID EXTINCTION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.wordpress.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/#comment-1907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A similar problem exists in asking people how to value a public good.  If you are thinking of building a bridge, there&#039;s no point estimating potential demand for it on the basis of the numbers of people who currently swim across the river.

(Probably you know this example.  Your post made me consider it in terms of the different opportunity costs, given different contextual framings -- currently swimming across vs. not crossing the river.)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar problem exists in asking people how to value a public good.  If you are thinking of building a bridge, there&#8217;s no point estimating potential demand for it on the basis of the numbers of people who currently swim across the river.</p>
<p>(Probably you know this example.  Your post made me consider it in terms of the different opportunity costs, given different contextual framings &#8212; currently swimming across vs. not crossing the river.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reid</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Reid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.wordpress.com/2005/08/19/willingness_to/#comment-1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Oh, wait, I have a thought ... what about clearly and transparently defining and enforcing property rights? I wonder if that might do it ... [/irony]&quot;

I used to think the Fifth Amendment had done that. Then the Supreme Court &quot;amended&quot; the Fifth Amendment. Now you are suggesting that we amend the amendment to the Fifth Amendment. I think I&#039;ll go take a nap.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, wait, I have a thought &#8230; what about clearly and transparently defining and enforcing property rights? I wonder if that might do it &#8230; [/irony]&#8221;</p>
<p>I used to think the Fifth Amendment had done that. Then the Supreme Court &#8220;amended&#8221; the Fifth Amendment. Now you are suggesting that we amend the amendment to the Fifth Amendment. I think I&#8217;ll go take a nap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

