Archive for June 30th, 2006

h1

Maryland Legislature’s Regulated Fiasco

June 30, 2006

Michael Giberson

Electric rate regulation in Maryland has become so, uh, I can’t think of a nice way to say it. Here’s the short version of the story: Years ago when Maryland passed a law restructuring its state electric industry, it placed Baltimore Gas & Electric electric rates under a long-term rate cap. That rate cap expires July 1 this year, during a time of high fuel prices, and rates were going to jump 72 percent. The rate hike has concerned consumers and alarmed state politicians, and politicians have been in a tizzy since it was announced. The (Republican) Governor has supported the state’s regulators, while the (Democrat-dominated) state legislature has been strongly opposed.

A recent law, passed over the Governor’s veto, defers some of the rate increase until later, fires the state regulatory commissioners, and directs the Governor to appoint a new commission from a list of nominees to be supplied by legislative leaders. The Chairman of the regulatory commission has filed suit against the legislator, challenging the dismissal.

In a post on the PFF blog, Ray Gifford explains the poor consequences for Marylanders from all of this grandstanding with more thoughtfulness and reason than I can muster on the topic. Personally, I think that the legislators must be a bunch of short-sighted, self-serving … well, just go read Ray.

h1

High Energy Costs Drive Processor Innovations; Retail Electricity Regulation Stifles Them

June 30, 2006

Lynne Kiesling

Have you noticed those AMD processor ads in airports, magazines, etc., that say things like “this processor saves enough power to steam the milk for 1,000 lattes”? I am fascinated by the fact that AMD sees value in a general marketing campaign focused on energy saving features of processors! We would see more such innovations, and more ubiquitous use of such innovations, if we abandoned the false notion that retail electricity regulation keeps energy costs low.

Why am I fascinated?

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Peer Production, Mutual Exchange of Value, and Capitalism

June 30, 2006

Lynne Kiesling

Chris Anderson’s Wired article on peer production is a good, short read. My favorite part is his closing comment:

But it’s a mistake to equate peer production with anticapitalism. This isn’t amateurs versus professionals; it’s each benefiting the other. Companies aren’t just exploiting free labor; they’re also creating the tools that give voice to millions. And that rowdy rabble isn’t replacing the firm; it’s providing the energy that drives a new sort of company, one that understands that talent exists outside Hollywood, that credentials matter less than passion, and that each of us has knowledge that’s valuable to someone, somewhere.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers