Lynne Kiesling
Do they not understand that lobbying is the inevitable, inescapeable product of a massive federal government? … If Franks is really concerned about corporate power and corruption in Washington, the best way to address his concerns would be to stop giving Washington so much power, and so much discretion to distribute that power. Shrink the federal government, return power and money to the private sector, castrate Congress, and drown the regulatory state.
Lynne Kiesling
One of the ways to talk about using experimental economics to test-bed policy changes is to use the metaphor of the wind tunnel. Either as a metaphor or as an actual engineering tool, the wind tunnel can be extremely valuable.
It’s also true for cycling, as seen in this article from Bicycling magazine about MIT’s cycling team. They use the school wind tunnel to work on their performance, tweaking the margins between power and efficiency, depending on what type of race it is (time trials are a different beast from road races, for example).
A very cool article. My favorite sentence:
It’s not as much about proving that we’re strong cyclists as it is about proving that it’s not just being strong that makes you a good cyclist.
I also didn’t realize that having my bottle on the down bar was so much less aerodynamic than having it on the seat bar. Have to change that!
Hat tip to Steve Antler at EconoPundit. I hate to burst Steve’s preconception that the MIT crowd isn’t athletic, but in cycling, the intersection between geekiness and prowess is large. Whether it’s obsessing about your bike, your gear, your cyclocomputer, your body position, your cadence, technology is one of the cyclist’s best friends. So it doesn’t surprise me that Team MIT would win their regionals! Although Cornell’s got a lot of engineers too (and gorgeous cycling terrain), so what gives there?
You are currently browsing the Knowledge Problem blog archives for the day Wednesday, August 23rd, 2006.
