Little girl, you need a license for that fruit stand

Lynne Kiesling

Here’s my cynical, anti-authoritarian link of the day: the mayor of Clayton, California shut down a fruit stand run by two little girls because it was a commercial enterprise in an area not zoned for commerce.

Hilariously, the mayor defends the decision to shut down this tiny lesson in capitalism, preferring to make it a tiny lesson in bureaucracy instead. His defense:

“They may start out with a little card-table and selling a couple of things, but then who is to say what else they have. Is all the produce made there, do they grow it themselves? Are they going to have eggs and chickens for sale next,” said Clayton Mayor Gregg Manning.

The mayor later called the girls and their father “self-centered.”

See also the Boing Boing post on the subject as well.

This may sound like it’s not that big a deal to you, but I think it’s disgusting on many levels (and given the comment volume on the Reason and Boing Boing posts, I’m not alone). I hope this guy gets sufficiently ridiculed that he’s voted out of office at the next election.

And if you want to see the bureaucratic process at work, check out the 19-page “produce stand/veggie stand ‘information’ ” document that the city has produced to detail the nefarious lawlessness of the girls and their parents, and to attempt to justify their bureaucratic approach as “balancing” the interests of many different groups in the community. Here’s a money quote:

Staff has determined that the outside sales activity involved in a residential zoning district is contrary to Chapter 17.71 Home Occupation Permits of the City of Clayton Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, is not allowed … Chapter 17.71 focuses on allowing residents in residential districts in Clayton to conduct limited commercial activities within a dwelling unit, and not allowing outside sales or external evidence of business activity.

I’m practically speechless. Well, I’m speechless in the realm of things that I am willing to say here in print for posterity. But you can imagine the colorful rant that the KP Spouse and I will enjoy over dinner this evening … and I may even go out and buy some dinner fixins from a roadside stand “in a residential area”, to celebrate the relative liberty that those sellers and I enjoy for not being in Clayton, California.

Welcome Deep Glamour!

Lynne Kiesling

Virginia Postrel and Kate Coe have started Deep Glamour, which “explores the magic of glamour in its many manifestations, from movies, fashion, and advertising to real estate, politics, and sports.”

Today Virginia has an energy-related post, about the visual elegance of wind turbines, and their use in advertising:

These images epitomize grace, one of the essential components of glamour. The blades appear to turn effortlessly, generating energy without waste. They look as autonomous as a bird in flight. Everyone, including me, leaves out the massive power lines required to carry the electricity some place where it will be useful. These are glamorized images.

This will be a great regular read. Welcome!

Vaclav Smil on the Pickens Plan for wind power and natural gas vehicles

Michael Giberson

Perhaps the greatest appeal of the Pickens Plan is its cascading simplicity. First, Pickens wants to dot the Great Plains (“the Saudi Arabia of wind power”) with wind turbines to replace all the electricity currently produced by burning natural gas. Second, he wants to use the natural gas freed by wind-powered generation to run efficient and clean natural gas vehicles. Third, he believes that this substitution will create a massive, new domestic aerospace-like industry — with well-paying jobs in the production of giant turbines and auxiliary equipment — that will bring economic revival to the depopulating Great Plains. Finally, Pickens says his plan would reduce the huge outflow of wealth to oil-producing nations as the U.S. cuts its oil imports by more than one-third.

If this were an opera, shouts of “Bravissimo!” would be in order. But despite its many positives, the timely realization of the Pickens Plan faces a number of extraordinary challenges, to say the least.

The quoted material is Vaclav Smil on the Pickens Plan in Yale Environment 360. “Cascading simplicity”? I’m still trying to decide if, ultimately, that is a compliment or an insult.

Related, a story in the Washington Post about the failure of natural gas vehicles to take off despite federal government plans in the 1990s.

HT to Environmental Capital for both links.