Archive for December 30th, 2008

h1

TuneCore and musician payment

December 30, 2008

Lynne Kiesling

In the ever-evolving (despite the efforts of RIAA) music industry, I find TuneCore very interesting. They have a fee-based music distribution system, under which an artist pays a fee and can have their single sold through iTunes, Rhapsody, etc. One of TuneCore’s most striking offerings is a flat $10 fee to distribute a song to 11 online music stores. The potentially transformative effect of this service should be obvious; not only does this service reinforce the move back toward the single and away from the album, but it also takes on some of the marketing and promotion function of the record label. If your primary market channel is live gigs and word of mouth, this distribution model may be more profitable for you than the traditional record label route.

Now they are starting up a service by which musicians can earn money by driving traffic to sponsor web sites.

Artists can promote free songs at their web sites, encouraging fans to visit the corporate sponsor to download the songs. It’s up to the band to decide how they want to promote that link and get people to those sites whether by displaying an adbox or in-blog links. Once at the site, users will interact with that web page to generate their download code, likely being polled at least for their e-mail address. The traffic fees will be split between the musicians, based on the number of downloads generated. More fans means more downloads, which means more money for the band in the end. It’s basically a way to monetize fame outside the traditional boundaries of record labels.

The whole Ars Technica article is well worth reading, because it’s full of insights about the connection between social networking and the production and distribution of creative work.

h1

UPDATE: The forthcoming dramatic fall of reported oil reserves

December 30, 2008

Michael Giberson

A week ago I wrote, “The forthcoming dramatic fall of reported oil reserves is due to falling prices and reporting requirements, not ‘peak oil’ or the manipulations of greedy industry executives.” However, as this Associated Press story reports, yesterday the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted proposed changes to reporting requirements that will have the effect of reducing the effects of price volatility on reserves reported.

An SEC press release is available, but as of Tuesday morning the full text of the new regulations were not available on the SEC website.

According to the AP article the new rules will:

  • Allow companies to use new technologies to determine proven oil and gas reserves provided the technologies have been shown to lead to reliable assessments.
  • Allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors. Until now, SEC rules limited disclosure only to proved reserves.
  • Require companies to report oil and natural gas reserves using an average price based on the prior 12-month period rather than year-end prices.
  • Require companies to certify the independence of petroleum auditors that audit their assessments of reserves.

The third item is the key to reducing the effects of price volatility on officially reported reserves.

The effect of price volatility on reserves can be reduced, but not eliminated, because the price of oil is one factor that determines how much of the oil in the ground will likely be economically producible (cost of production being the other main factor).  A prior twelve-month average of prices is not necessarily the best estimate for a company to use in its own internal evaluation of expected reserves – the company may have reasons to believe it can do better in pulling oil from the ground (or will do worse) than the amount indicated by using the twelve-month average price. But for financial reporting purposes it is important to have a standard and not too volatile measure.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41 other followers