<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does Waxman-Markey have to say about kites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/08/what-does-waxman-markey-have-to-say-about-kites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/08/what-does-waxman-markey-have-to-say-about-kites/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pj</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/08/what-does-waxman-markey-have-to-say-about-kites/#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=4735#comment-8496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re assuming that the Waxman-Markey/Obama Administration/environmentalists are interested in finding the best energy system/mix.  That&#039;s an erroneous assumption.  They don&#039;t like the energy system that has arisen in the market, so their going to mandate a different one.  Economic efficiency don&#039;t enter into their calculations.  They have a different agenda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re assuming that the Waxman-Markey/Obama Administration/environmentalists are interested in finding the best energy system/mix.  That&#8217;s an erroneous assumption.  They don&#8217;t like the energy system that has arisen in the market, so their going to mandate a different one.  Economic efficiency don&#8217;t enter into their calculations.  They have a different agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/08/what-does-waxman-markey-have-to-say-about-kites/#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=4735#comment-8477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;KP&quot; caught my eye.  I also liked &quot;ideas in the marketplace&quot; and &quot;markets will help us&quot; too.  I get tired of the hand-wringing from folks who should know better but don&#039;t when they gasp for government help on the future of energy.  Let the federal government get back to what it was originally assigned, interstate commerce (i.e. transmission of power over state lines,) and let the power utilities figure out the best way to supply and distribute the power.  The latter is best done by employing market forces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;KP&#8221; caught my eye.  I also liked &#8220;ideas in the marketplace&#8221; and &#8220;markets will help us&#8221; too.  I get tired of the hand-wringing from folks who should know better but don&#8217;t when they gasp for government help on the future of energy.  Let the federal government get back to what it was originally assigned, interstate commerce (i.e. transmission of power over state lines,) and let the power utilities figure out the best way to supply and distribute the power.  The latter is best done by employing market forces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

