<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hohm, and cloud computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/29/hohm-and-cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/29/hohm-and-cloud-computing/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Anderson</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/06/29/hohm-and-cloud-computing/#comment-8624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=4863#comment-8624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What am I missing that makes cloud computing so attractive? I have an office computer that only gets used 30 hours a week, and two personal computers that soak up another 24 hours, max, so I have cheap compute cycles coming out my ears.  If I need a big processing facility, I can buy a half-dozen El Cheapo PCs, load them up with Linux and Mathematica, and parallel process until the cows come home.

In the statistics business, we routinely get a late night inspiration and fire off an analysis or simulation that ties up some office or university processor for hours or days.  We can do this because compute power is a cheap commodity, literally sitting idle on our desks.  When some technocrat decides that Cloud Computing (TM) is More Efficient, I check my wallet, and hope the university IT folks see this as a gimmick to gather subscriptions--and YOUR DATA--for life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I missing that makes cloud computing so attractive? I have an office computer that only gets used 30 hours a week, and two personal computers that soak up another 24 hours, max, so I have cheap compute cycles coming out my ears.  If I need a big processing facility, I can buy a half-dozen El Cheapo PCs, load them up with Linux and Mathematica, and parallel process until the cows come home.</p>
<p>In the statistics business, we routinely get a late night inspiration and fire off an analysis or simulation that ties up some office or university processor for hours or days.  We can do this because compute power is a cheap commodity, literally sitting idle on our desks.  When some technocrat decides that Cloud Computing (TM) is More Efficient, I check my wallet, and hope the university IT folks see this as a gimmick to gather subscriptions&#8211;and YOUR DATA&#8211;for life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

