<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walmart supports employer health care to raise rivals&#8217; costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/07/02/walmart-supports-employer-health-care-to-raise-rivals-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/07/02/walmart-supports-employer-health-care-to-raise-rivals-costs/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health care policy, individual consumption portfolios, and liberty &#171; Knowledge Problem</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/07/02/walmart-supports-employer-health-care-to-raise-rivals-costs/#comment-8731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Health care policy, individual consumption portfolios, and liberty &#171; Knowledge Problem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=4893#comment-8731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is why the political pressure and the threat of coercion that lead to this kind of result [Walmart&#039;s support of an employer health care mandate -ed.] is so dangerous and harmful to human beings and other living [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is why the political pressure and the threat of coercion that lead to this kind of result [Walmart&#39;s support of an employer health care mandate -ed.] is so dangerous and harmful to human beings and other living [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libert</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/07/02/walmart-supports-employer-health-care-to-raise-rivals-costs/#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[libert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=4893#comment-8650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A plan that would introduce a portable public option wouldn&#039;t likely affect Walmart&#039;s competitive position. Since the plan is portable, it would weaken or eliminate the employer-based structure of health insurance, leading to no differences in costs between Walmart and competitors. Thus, any capitulation by Walmart to such a plan couldn&#039;t be explained by Megan&#039;s story.

Regardless, isn&#039;t the real issue in this story here that Walmart has sufficient buying power to act as a monopsonist purchaser of health insurance? If Megan&#039;s story is right (although I doubt that it is), there is a strong case for pursuing Walmart for violation of antitrust.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A plan that would introduce a portable public option wouldn&#8217;t likely affect Walmart&#8217;s competitive position. Since the plan is portable, it would weaken or eliminate the employer-based structure of health insurance, leading to no differences in costs between Walmart and competitors. Thus, any capitulation by Walmart to such a plan couldn&#8217;t be explained by Megan&#8217;s story.</p>
<p>Regardless, isn&#8217;t the real issue in this story here that Walmart has sufficient buying power to act as a monopsonist purchaser of health insurance? If Megan&#8217;s story is right (although I doubt that it is), there is a strong case for pursuing Walmart for violation of antitrust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

