Archive for August 4th, 2009

h1

Keeping some speculators out of the oil market may lead to higher oil prices

August 4, 2009

Michael Giberson

From Fortune-Investor Daily:

If Congress or the CFTC forces through stiff curbs on futures trading by so-called “speculators” — i.e. investors who use futures to bet on future price movements but don’t buy actual oil — it may lead to higher, not lower, oil prices over the long term.

Why? Imagine you’re an oil company CEO thinking about drilling a new oil well that won’t produce until 2011. Given the high upfront costs of drilling, you’re going to be more likely to undertake the project if you can use the futures market to lock in oil prices in 2011 that will justify your drilling costs. The buyer on the other end of your futures trade is probably an investor — someone who will commit to paying you $75 a barrel for oil in 2011 because he believes actual price in 2011 will be even higher.

However, if fewer investors are allowed to take the other side of your trade, you will have a harder time locking in a good price for your 2011 oil. That could make it harder for you to justify the upfront cost of building the new well. Less investment in new oil wells means less future supply, and less supply means higher oil prices.

h1

Newsweek smart grid article

August 4, 2009

Lynne Kiesling

Last week Newsweek had an article on smart grid investments and projects that provides a good overview, focusing on the newly-funded Department of Energy demonstration projects. Many of you will already know more about these than the details provide in the article, but it’s a good overview if you don’t.

h1

NIST Smart Grid Workshop

August 4, 2009

Lynne Kiesling

I’m at a NIST smart grid workshop, where the objective is to take the identified, prioritized smart grid interoperability standards requirements and start working on the game plan for developing interoperability standards out of them. Toby Considine sat next to me yesterday morning and wrote about his observations, so I’ll spare you mine, except for one: as he points out, there seems to be more coalescence around the theme of “light, loose integration and a loosely-coupled system of systems” than I feared there would be, but still too often some stakeholders advocate for decisions based on the perpetuation of existing business models, and not based on the idea of having simple common data models that don’t forclose future evolutions of technology, business models, and consumer value propositions.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers