<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart meter benefits mostly going to utilities so far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/10/23/smart-meter-benefits-mostly-going-to-utilities-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/10/23/smart-meter-benefits-mostly-going-to-utilities-so-far/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Shillock</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/10/23/smart-meter-benefits-mostly-going-to-utilities-so-far/#comment-9956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Shillock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=5717#comment-9956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever &quot;smart meters&quot; or &quot;smart metering&quot; will or will not do, one thing consumers do not need is to multiply their trivial market choices.  As we know from the literature, proliferaion of choices confuses and inhibits choices, rationally so.  We do not need to spend time &quot;managing&quot; our electricity or other energy usage for maximum efficiency.  Good technological advances will necessarily make our lives easier so we can spend them doing things we enjoy and find fulfilling, not more complicated.  Since the ascendency of market fundamentalism (CF. The Myth of the Rational Market) policy has sought to proliferate choices or the appearance of meaningful choices as if that were and end in itself rather than a means.  Clearly, where market mechanisms deliver fair and efficient outcomes they are to be preferred, not otherwise.

Technology (or whatever kind) is the second religion of every American, our dues ex machina for any problem.  But our capabilities for technological innovations and our successes have blinded us to the downsides of same and led to policies that entail that any innovation is presumed socially beneficial until proven otherwise.  Our technologies are too powerful and our resources are too limited to keep pursuing this 19th century thinking and value system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever &#8220;smart meters&#8221; or &#8220;smart metering&#8221; will or will not do, one thing consumers do not need is to multiply their trivial market choices.  As we know from the literature, proliferaion of choices confuses and inhibits choices, rationally so.  We do not need to spend time &#8220;managing&#8221; our electricity or other energy usage for maximum efficiency.  Good technological advances will necessarily make our lives easier so we can spend them doing things we enjoy and find fulfilling, not more complicated.  Since the ascendency of market fundamentalism (CF. The Myth of the Rational Market) policy has sought to proliferate choices or the appearance of meaningful choices as if that were and end in itself rather than a means.  Clearly, where market mechanisms deliver fair and efficient outcomes they are to be preferred, not otherwise.</p>
<p>Technology (or whatever kind) is the second religion of every American, our dues ex machina for any problem.  But our capabilities for technological innovations and our successes have blinded us to the downsides of same and led to policies that entail that any innovation is presumed socially beneficial until proven otherwise.  Our technologies are too powerful and our resources are too limited to keep pursuing this 19th century thinking and value system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart meter benefits should mostly go to utilities, initially &#171; Knowledge Problem</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/10/23/smart-meter-benefits-mostly-going-to-utilities-so-far/#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart meter benefits should mostly go to utilities, initially &#171; Knowledge Problem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=5717#comment-9955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week or so ago I posted, &#8220;Smart meter benefits mostly going to utilities so far,&#8221; riffing off a Forbes.com story, &#8220;Smart Meters: Not So Sharp For Consumers.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week or so ago I posted, &#8220;Smart meter benefits mostly going to utilities so far,&#8221; riffing off a Forbes.com story, &#8220;Smart Meters: Not So Sharp For Consumers.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FT.com &#124; FT Energy Source &#124; The Source: BP; $100 oil; Commodity tracker funds; Senate climate bill</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/10/23/smart-meter-benefits-mostly-going-to-utilities-so-far/#comment-9932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FT.com &#124; FT Energy Source &#124; The Source: BP; $100 oil; Commodity tracker funds; Senate climate bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=5717#comment-9932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] meter benefits mostly going to utilities so far (Knowledge [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meter benefits mostly going to utilities so far (Knowledge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

