<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas and the Tres Amigas interconnection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/13/texas-and-the-tres-amigas-interconnection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/13/texas-and-the-tres-amigas-interconnection/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.O.U.G.</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/13/texas-and-the-tres-amigas-interconnection/#comment-10706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.O.U.G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=6228#comment-10706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delivery of electric energy is not delivery of electrons. Electrons don&#039;t flow freely through AC transformers (autotransformers notwithstanding), either, but that&#039;s hardly important in a commercial or regulatory sense, is it? That said, electrons barely move in AC transmission of electric energy, whereas they do actually flow in DC transmission. [Does anybody care that they flow backward?] To further confuse the issue, electric energy flow in balanced 3-phase AC transmission at zero power factor is constant, every bit as constant as DC flow. The distinction comes mainly in the controllability of the DC link, which prevents &quot;loop&quot; and/or inadvertent flows that would not generally be part of the commercial transactions across a link if it were AC. I can&#039;t really see why DC rather than AC creates a jurisdictional wall that precludes interstate commerce, when it enables transactions moving a product (energy, not electrons) across state lines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delivery of electric energy is not delivery of electrons. Electrons don&#8217;t flow freely through AC transformers (autotransformers notwithstanding), either, but that&#8217;s hardly important in a commercial or regulatory sense, is it? That said, electrons barely move in AC transmission of electric energy, whereas they do actually flow in DC transmission. [Does anybody care that they flow backward?] To further confuse the issue, electric energy flow in balanced 3-phase AC transmission at zero power factor is constant, every bit as constant as DC flow. The distinction comes mainly in the controllability of the DC link, which prevents &#8220;loop&#8221; and/or inadvertent flows that would not generally be part of the commercial transactions across a link if it were AC. I can&#8217;t really see why DC rather than AC creates a jurisdictional wall that precludes interstate commerce, when it enables transactions moving a product (energy, not electrons) across state lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

