<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why hasn&#8217;t the web revolutionized scholarly publication?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/14/why-hasnt-the-web-revolutionized-scholarly-publication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/14/why-hasnt-the-web-revolutionized-scholarly-publication/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reid</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/14/why-hasnt-the-web-revolutionized-scholarly-publication/#comment-10770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Reid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=6244#comment-10770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One could argue that the web has recently begun to revolutionize &quot;scholarly&quot; publication, as evidenced by the scientific cesspool known a &quot;climategate&quot;. :-)

Some scientists have begun publishing papers to their own and others&#039; websites because they have discovered that there are a number of fully qualified peers among the regular visitors to and commenters on these sites. 

Many non-peers have recently been exposed to the current state of the peer review process, at least in climate science; and, to efforts to exclude certain positions from peer review. They have also been exposed to efforts to use the web to silence dissent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could argue that the web has recently begun to revolutionize &#8220;scholarly&#8221; publication, as evidenced by the scientific cesspool known a &#8220;climategate&#8221;. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Some scientists have begun publishing papers to their own and others&#8217; websites because they have discovered that there are a number of fully qualified peers among the regular visitors to and commenters on these sites. </p>
<p>Many non-peers have recently been exposed to the current state of the peer review process, at least in climate science; and, to efforts to exclude certain positions from peer review. They have also been exposed to efforts to use the web to silence dissent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

