<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A private right of action on price gouging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/25/a-private-right-of-action-on-price-gouging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/25/a-private-right-of-action-on-price-gouging/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 便乗値上げの被害？ &#187; 経済学101</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/25/a-private-right-of-action-on-price-gouging/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[便乗値上げの被害？ &#187; 経済学101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=6315#comment-10937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A private right of action on price gouging « Knowledge Problem To that end, “the purpose of this bill is to grant citizens who are victims of illegal price gouging in times of emergency the right to directly sue the responsible party.” The proposal would allow a victim to sue to recover up to “actual damages” or $1000, whichever is greater, and give the court discretion to award a prevailing plaintiff up to $5000 and reasonable attorneys’ fees. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A private right of action on price gouging « Knowledge Problem To that end, “the purpose of this bill is to grant citizens who are victims of illegal price gouging in times of emergency the right to directly sue the responsible party.” The proposal would allow a victim to sue to recover up to “actual damages” or $1000, whichever is greater, and give the court discretion to award a prevailing plaintiff up to $5000 and reasonable attorneys’ fees. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.O.U.G.</title>
		<link>http://knowledgeproblem.com/2010/01/25/a-private-right-of-action-on-price-gouging/#comment-10913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.O.U.G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgeproblem.com/?p=6315#comment-10913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be great fun to watch. Do keep us posted. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be great fun to watch. Do keep us posted. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

