Archive for October, 2010

h1

Happy Birthday to James M. Buchanan

October 4, 2010

Michael Giberson

I was fortunate to have a class with James Buchanan my first semester as a graduate student at George Mason University. Unfortunately, it was the year after he had been awarded the Nobel prize, and he was still doing a lot of traveling and speaking. He wasn’t around nearly enough to suit me at the time. Still, I have learned a lot from Prof. Buchanan, both through the class, through his writings, through his former students, through their writings, and from his participation in the regular Public Choice lectures – both when he presented and when he sat in the audience and asked the right questions.

Prof. Buchanan is ninety-one years old today. Happy Birthday!

(HT to Cafe Hayek.)

h1

“Price gouging in the Auction House”

October 4, 2010

Michael Giberson

A complaint is posted to an online forum:

… something needs to be said. I have always noted that price gouging is something that occurs on the [Auction House] and notion seems to be prevalant that “If there is someone out there stupid enough to pay that much, I’m going to charge that much.” Okay, I can see making a sweet bit of profit even though I disapprove of price gouging as being simply wrong. However since the inception of F2P, I have noted that the price gouging has gotten wildly out of hand. Take for example the one auction I came across on the [Auction House], a pair of recipes, a Heavy Elven Cotten shoes recipe with starting bid of 5 gold and a buy out of 8 gold. Or the Elven Travellers recipe for 950 silver starting bid and a by out of 1 gold. And neither one of these recipes were anywheres near being at supreme level. Something seriously needs to be done about the price gouging… If people cannot be honest and regulate themselves perhaps it needs to be done for them with caps on pricing.

… As a matter of fact I have seen quite a number of people taking the items they get in their ‘gift boxs’ when they start a new toon and immediately sell on them on the trade channel or the ah for outrageously high prices. Consideration, at the very least, needs to be given to these immoral and unethical offenses. Thank you.

The setting is the Lord of the Rings Online [LOTRO] game. “F2P” is the September 10 switch in online business models from subscription-based to “Free to Play,” no cost to download and play the game (you can subscribe and get additional benefits and they’ll be happy to sell your character items in the LOTRO stores, but you can get started for free; see also this assessment).

I don’t play LOTRO, the forum post simply showed up in a Google News search on “price gouging”; I don’t know the auction house rules. The description in the complaint makes it sound sort of like eBay. Probably the switch to F2P brought in a bunch of new players, anxious to accumulate resources and not so familiar with prior market prices. Experienced players trying to pick up an item or two in the auctions, and accustomed to lower prices, may find the price boom unpleasant. I’d predict that prices will settle back into ranges that experienced players can live with once the initial F2P-inspired boom in demand has been accommodated.

The forum post inspired a significant back-and-forth discussion. It is an interesting application of the term “price gouging,” but my response would be more or less the same as the first commenter:

lol at trying to apply morals to prices in a video game.

h1

The continuing debate over wind power and net emissions

October 3, 2010

Michael Giberson

We’ve discussed the complicated relationship between wind power and the net reductions in greenhouse gas and other emissions here previously. Industry viewpoints come to expected conclusions – it is no surprise that the Colorado oil and gas industry promotes the view that wind is less special than claimed, nor that the American Wind Energy Association argues wind it better than the oil and gas industry says.

Among the things that makes the issue complicated is that the answer will depend on a lot of factors – the power system that the wind is connected to, what other generators are doing, how the power system chooses to manage wind power’s variability, just how variable the wind power is, and when it is generated. Answers can vary depending on how you frame the question and what data you turn to for analysis.

Into the mess wades F.P. Shioshansi, and he does a pretty good job of sorting through conflicting claims in a post at the EU Energy Policy Blog. For more, Shioshansi recommends Ross Baldick’s article in the recent USAEE Dialogue, “Wind and Energy Markets: A Case Study of Texas.”

h1

Building a “passive house”

October 2, 2010

Michael Giberson

Many critics of smart grid-related ideas for saving energy object that consumers won’t want to sit around watching energy prices, flipping light switches and delaying the dishwasher when prices spike now and again to save a few bucks. Of course the critics are right on this point. The best smart grid energy saving ideas are mostly in the realm of “fix it and forget it” devices. You set the dial and let the device do the work.

Perhaps the ultimate “fix it and forget it” device for home energy saving is a passive house – a house that is designed and built to require minimal amounts of energy. This isn’t a smart grid kind of thing – these designs are so smart that they can be dumb; they don’t need to know the price of electricity.

Or rather, because a passive home design requires additional upfront effort and expense, the smarts need to be exercised mightily up front. As discussed in an article in the New York Times describing a passive house being built in suburban Boston central Vermont (edited, see comments), such homes are more expensive to design and build. After that, it is mostly “fix it and forget it.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers