Future of Lubbock’s power supply efforts heads to court, with Lubbock citizens paying lawyers on both sides of case

Michael Giberson

In January I mentioned that a municipal utility agency created as a kind-of public-private partnership between the West Texas Municipal Power Agency and Republic Power Partners was taking off in an unexpected direction and leaving more than a few locals wondering what was going on. In brief, High Plains Diversified Energy Corporation, the partnership, was created a year or two ago to find or build power plants to serve the WTMPA’s post-2019 need for power – 2019 is when existing wholesale supply contracts will expire – but in January it suddenly proposed purchase of two large and somewhat distant power plants with more than 3-times the generating capacity and more than 7 years sooner than necessary.

It may well be, as the HPDEC maintains, that it is getting a great deal on the power plants. But a few problems have sprung up: HPDEC wants to borrow $1.5 billion or so in municipal bonds to finance the purchase of the plants and necessary transmission enhancements, the City of Lubbock asserts the group doesn’t have the legal authority to do so. There will be a lot of excess power, and selling the excess power is complicated since there are limits to the sale of power to non-municipal customers when the power plants are funded by tax-exempt municipal bonds. Meanwhile, the city of Odessa, Texas, home of the two power plants, doesn’t want that property taken off the city’s tax rolls and has convinced the state legislature to protect its interests. Lubbock, WTMPA, HPDEC, and Odessa, among others, are headed to court today to get some clarification.

Charles Dunn, a local attorney blogging the developments at Lubbock Power Grab, notices that because Lubbock residents make up 85 percent of the WTMPA load, we’ll be on the hook for legal fees on both the WTMPA/HPDEC and City of Lubbock sides of the issue.

Here’s hoping they come to a quick settlement.

ADDED: That was quick. Headlines after the hearing, from the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, “Major electricity project can’t move forward, judge says“; from KCBD, “Judge kills $1.5 billion Lubbock power deal.” In essence the judge concluded that the public-private joint venture was not legally formed, so not only can it not be exempt from paying local taxes, not use eminent domain if needed for transmission, and not sell municipal bonds to raise oodles of cash, it can not and does not exist legally.

So, barring a rescue on appeal, the joint venture entity is dead and with it all the complications associated with the proposed power plant purchases.

Which just leaves the city of Lubbock’s municipal utility and the other members of the WTMPA with the complication of figuring how they will replace the wholesale power contracts with Xcel that expire in 2019.

Massachusetts wants $22.5 million in tax breaks back from Evergreen Solar, company in dire financial condition

Michael Giberson

Happier Days, from The Boston Globe: "Evergreen Solar's CEO, Richard M. Feldt (right), says Governor Deval Patrick's commitment to solar power played a key role in the company's decision to expand in Massachusetts. (Photo by Ellen Harasimowicz for The Boston Globe/File 2007)"

Politicians show up, grinning for the cameras at groundbreaking, they come applauding the expansion announcement (and why not, public tax breaks and other policy support for solar power manufacturers were chief among the reasons the plants were built in the first place), but where are the toothy smiles of supporting public officials when the company closes the manufacturing plant down? Evergreen Solar, a prized clean-energy/green jobs catch of the state of Massachusetts thanks to some creative economic development work by state and local governments, is closing its manufacturing plant in Devens, MA.

According to one summary, “Among the incentives the state offered Evergreen Solar were a $15 million property tax break, a $7.5 million in state tax break, $2.7 million through a subsidized lease and $21 million in cash grants. Not to mention that the state spent $13 million in construction on roads and other infrastructure to support the plant.” Another report put the figure at “at least $43m in state aid.”

Massachusetts politicians no longer swarm the gates of Evergreen Solar; instead they send notice that they want the tax breaks back, seeking $22.5 million from a company that has been losing money so quickly that it may not survive to the end of 2011. And perhaps Massachusetts should not feel especially foolish, Evergreen managed to squeak out significant support from government entities in Germany (“grants totaling approximately $34 million at current exchange rates”) and China, too  ($33 million in state-owned company loans to Evergreen and a similar amount to its Chinese partner).

Just another warning sign that the business of promoting business with tax breaks and other local subsidies is fraught with difficulty.