Posts Tagged ‘airline operations’

h1

Southwest Airlines’s hedges

May 2, 2012

Michael Giberson

“We don’t know where the price of crude is going to be,” says [Southwest Airlines's Chris] Monroe. But, he adds, “I think we have to be generally bullish just because we’re trying to protect against an increase … So we have a little bit of a bias that prices may go higher.”

He chuckles that he and [former SW treasurer Scott] Topping, longtime colleagues and friends, used to describe themselves as the “most conflicted” managers in the building — although low fuel prices would benefit Southwest overall, it would mean their carefully crafted hedging strategy wouldn’t pay off as well….

Still, “In my heart, I would love lower prices,” says Monroe. “Lower prices are good for everybody in our country, and especially good for an airline.”

From, “The ‘Fixer’ at Southwest Airlines,” CNBC.

Notice that Southwest trades crude oil options and other derivatives even though they are not in the physical crude oil market. Proposals that aim to limit trading to parties with “true” commercial interests in the underlying commodity could inadvertently trip up quite reasonable hedging strategies such as pursued by Southwest. (Presumably they find the liquidity available in the much more heavily traded crude oil markets attractive compared to trading in the less liquid jet fuel markets even though the crude oil price is an inexact proxy for the price of jet fuel.)

In related news, Delta Air Lines is buying a refineryfrom the Phillips 66 unit being spun off of ConocoPhillips. According to Dana Blankenhorn at SeekingAlpha, “Delta Refinery Deal All About Southwest.”

(I’m still with the skeptics on this deal. Is is really going to be cheaper for Delta to own a refinery and make jet fuel than just buy jet fuel in a reasonably competitive market? Another way of asking the question, why does Delta think it can do a better job of running the refinery than ConocoPhillips did? Surely contract-based cost management as practiced by Southwest will be more flexible and adaptable to changing conditions than Delta’s ownership of an aging refinery near Philadelphia.)

h1

Administration abandons airport landing slot auction

May 14, 2009

Michael Giberson

From the New York Times City Room, “U.S. Won’t Auction Airport Landing Slots“:

The United States Department of Transportation has canceled a plan to auction landing slots at New York City’s three airports, officials announced on Wednesday, bringing an end to a widely criticized effort by the Bush administration to use market incentives to reduce congestion and delays.

“We’re still serious about tackling aviation congestion in the New York region,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in Manhattan on Wednesday in remarks to the Association for a Better New York. “I’ll be talking with airline, airport and consumer stakeholders, as well as elected officials, over the summer about the best ways to move forward.” [Links in original.]

An auction would let prices help clear demand for landing slots, and would therefore reduce congestion into and out of the three New York airports that were targeted by the proposal. The administration, by avoiding auctions, chooses to continue to clear the market by making people wait instead. Since some of that waiting is done by people flying around in large jets, burning jet fuel and emitting stuff, there are environmental consequences to the administration’s status quo approach.

Just saying.

(HT to Sandy Ikeda)

h1

More on airline fuel cost hedging: Air New Zealand takes hit

January 23, 2009

Michael Giberson

As Lynne was saying yesterday with respect to Southwest Airlines losses of $117 million related to its fuel cost hedging operations, Air New Zealand is discovering with hedging that “sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you.”

Platts reports Air New Zealand told the Australian stock exchange that “unbooked hedge positions for its 2009 financial year, which runs from April 2008 to March 2009, stood at $126.39 million.” That loss is up from the $81 million report of unbooked losses reported in October for 2009, and the air carrier’s hedging position for 2010 is also in the red.

Which doesn’t mean that the hedges were not a good idea at the time they were entered into, of course. The article also points out that “unbooked hedging losses can vary considerably from final booked losses, particularly if futures prices change significantly between the time mark-to-market is done and the contracts expire.”

The Platts story provides several details about Air New Zealand’s complex hedging strategy which relied on trading jet fuel options in Singapore and crude oil futures on the NYMEX.

Previously here: Does hedging against fuel price movements increase airline value?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers