Posts Tagged ‘electric vehicles’

h1

McArdle on the search for financial villians; Indiviglio on electric cars and power costs

October 27, 2009

Michael Giberson

Worth reading: Megan McArdle, “The Search for Financial Villains Founders,” at The Atlantic: Business Channel. Apparently, damning remarks taken out of context from emails are not so damning when considered within the original context.

On the other hand, I’m not so convinced by the earlier post at The Atlantic Business Channel by Daniel Indiviglio, which asserts “Electric Car Will Increase Power Costs” (discussing this Bloomberg story, “California Electric-Cars Push May Raise Power Costs.” Notice Bloomberg’s “may raise” becomes the Atlantic’s “will increase.”). The primary point made is that utilities anticipate needing to spend a lot of money to adapt the grid to accommodate vehicle recharging, which means that utilities will be asking regulators for permission to recover more revenue through regulated rates.

But if electric car owners are paying for the power they use, and those payments cover the costs associated with providing vehicle charging services, why should rates go up?  And if, in fact, the smart grid and the electric car are a match made in enviro-heaven, and therefore the average system use rate increases, then average rates should fall.

h1

Where does lithium come from, anyway?

October 27, 2009

Michael Giberson

Joshua Keating, in Foreign Policy, offers a photo essay on lithium extraction in Bolivia. Keating said:

Bolivia hopes its lithium treasure can pull it up from the bottom rungs of the global economy, but as countries throughout the developing world have learned the hard way, resource wealth can just as easily lead to corruption, mismanagement, and more misery for the world’s neediest people. Lithium may very well be the secret to reducing the world’s disastrous dependence on oil, but that doesn’t mean a new “resource curse” can’t take its place.

FP says the “Fifty to 70 percent of the world’s supply” is located in just one spot in Bolivia, but that claim is higher than I see other places.  In any case, over 80 percent of the world’s production of lithium in 2008 came from three other countries: Argentina, Australia, and Chile.

HT to the Texas Energy and Environment blog.

h1

An illustration of the problem discussed in an earlier post

October 15, 2009

Michael Giberson

In a previous post I was complaining that the entrenched regulated utility industry makes the electric power business resistant to entrepreneurial efforts to shake things up, even when those entrepreneurs want to do things that regulators, utilities, and consumers say they want. (Like environmentally-friendly cogeneration projects, as The New Republic story mentioned.)

A story posted Tuesday at the New York TimesGreen Inc. blog provides another example: “Discord Over Regulation of Car Charging.” The story reports that the three major regulated electric utilities in California each advocate different models for the regulation (or not) of electric car charging stations by the California Public Utilities Commission. Entrepreneurial companies like Better Place, trying desperately to provide the electric vehicles that many consumers, environmentalists, and policymakers say the country desperately needs, find themselves caught in a regulatory battle.

Not surprisingly, Better Place, based in Palo Alt, Calif., echoed that view, arguing that a heavy regulatory hand could stifle innovation and scare off investors. “At the early stages of this industry, we encourage the commission to set rules that do not foreclose new business models,” Jason Wolf, a Better Place executive, wrote in a filing with the commission.

It might be worse in areas regulated by municipalities rather than the state. In Sacramento, with a city-owned monopoly utility rather than a state-regulated private monopoly:

[Sacramento Municipal Utility District] has asserted that it has “exclusive jurisdiction over third-party electric vehicle service providers within its service territory” and that there is no “commercial space” for companies like Better Place to sell electricity at retail rates.

(HT to the Public Utility Law Project of New York, which seems to inadvertently help make my point by insisting, “History and experience with unlicensed ESCOs and submeterers teaches that consumers will need to be protected, for example, with proper certification and oversight of safety, non-utility metering of sales, and other consumer protection issues, such as regulation of rates, terms and conditions, and adequate price disclosure.”)

h1

Life imitates art: Nissan to give electric car a “beautiful and futuristic” noise

September 22, 2009

Michael Giberson

From the LA Times car culture blog Up to Speed:

LeafA campaign backed by automakers and some lawmakers to make electric or hybrid cars noisier in a bid to increase safety for pedestrians and cyclists has taken a strange, “Blade Runner”-type twist.

Nissan sound engineers have announced that the Leaf electric car set for release next year will emit a “beautiful and futuristic” noise similar to the sound of flying cars — or “spinners” — that buzz around 2019 Los Angeles in Ridley Scott’s dystopian thriller based on a Philip K. Dick science fiction novel.

“We decided that if we’re going to do this, if we have to make sound, then we’re going to make it beautiful and futuristic,” Toshiyuki Tabata, Nissan’s noise and vibration expert, told Bloomberg. “We wanted something a bit different, something closer to the world of art.” (Links and LEAF image from source.)

The article points out that some people think we’ll download sounds for our future electric cars like we currently can download ringtones for phones. The Blade Runner police cruiser is pictured below, but if I’m going to get a futuristic movie-based car I’d rather have one of the Audi’s that Will Smith drove in I, Robot.

Can I get one that plays “Theme from Shaft”?

(Related story on Slashdot via Marginal Revolution.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers