Posts Tagged ‘unintended consequences’

h1

Anecdotal evidence on employment effects from stimulus spending

May 5, 2010

Michael Giberson

From Aguanomics:

I was talking to a friend, and he mentioned that he’d hired an extra guy under the stimulus program.

“Yeah, they are paying 80 percent of his wages and overhead. It’s a win-win for him and me…”

“…but then I fired another guy; he just cost too much compared to the new guy.”

h1

Administration abandons airport landing slot auction

May 14, 2009

Michael Giberson

From the New York Times City Room, “U.S. Won’t Auction Airport Landing Slots“:

The United States Department of Transportation has canceled a plan to auction landing slots at New York City’s three airports, officials announced on Wednesday, bringing an end to a widely criticized effort by the Bush administration to use market incentives to reduce congestion and delays.

“We’re still serious about tackling aviation congestion in the New York region,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in Manhattan on Wednesday in remarks to the Association for a Better New York. “I’ll be talking with airline, airport and consumer stakeholders, as well as elected officials, over the summer about the best ways to move forward.” [Links in original.]

An auction would let prices help clear demand for landing slots, and would therefore reduce congestion into and out of the three New York airports that were targeted by the proposal. The administration, by avoiding auctions, chooses to continue to clear the market by making people wait instead. Since some of that waiting is done by people flying around in large jets, burning jet fuel and emitting stuff, there are environmental consequences to the administration’s status quo approach.

Just saying.

(HT to Sandy Ikeda)

h1

“Congress didn’t intend to create SUVs”

December 29, 2008

Michael Giberson

From Two Billion Cars by Daniel Sperling and Deborah Gordon:

Ironically, it was the fuel economy standards adopted by Congress in 1975 that set the stage for the later surge of gas-guzzling SUVs and light trucks. As Congress was designing its fuel economy, safety, and emission standards, Detroit lobbied to exempt light trucks, which at the time were used mostly by businesses and farms for hauling goods and providing services. This loophole was written into law, with light trucks subject to less stringent requirements. They also were exempt from the large tax imposed on “gas guzzlers.” The light-truck loopholes were to be the industry’s savior for almost three decades. Chrysler recovered from its 1980 near-bankruptcy in part by taking advantage of those loopholes, producing the first modern minivan, a vehicle built on a truck platform but designed for family travel. Minivans became the new version of the station wagon, only “better” because they were cheaper to make and buy, thanks to the gentler energy, emissions, and safety regulations, and their exemption from the gas-guzzler tax.

Consumers flocked to these cheaper carlike trucks. The advent of the minivan was accompanied by a slow expansion of the pickup truck market and soon followed by a surge of SUVs in the 1990s. Chrysler was again the leader, building on its 1987 acquisition of American Motors Corporation and its Jeep vehicle line to pioneer the SUV market. Ford and GM followed. SUVs flourished.

I think this brief narrative puts too much emphasis on the role of Congress, and neglects the effects of rising incomes and changing gasoline prices on automobile industry developments over the “almost three decades” discussed. Nonetheless, the episode should serve as a warning to folks with grand policy ambitions about the weaknesses of piecemeal, ad hoc interventions into people’s lives.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers