Posts Tagged ‘zone pricing’

h1

New York Attorney General proposes to prohibit use of business-related reasoning in gasoline wholesaling

January 2, 2012

Michael Giberson

It sounds kind of funny to say the New York Attorney General wants to prohibit business-related reasoning in gasoline wholesaling. After all, gasoline wholesaling is a business activity and generally business-related reasoning would be entirely appropriate. It sounds like asking a court not to act on law-related reasoning or asking a politician not to think politically. But read the report put out by the AG’s office, “Report on New York Gasoline Prices,” and see what it says on pages 37-39.

At issue is “zone pricing,” a practice by which wholesalers charge differing prices to retailers in different locations, usually based on an estimate of what the market will bear. A New York state law passed in 2008 tried to ban zone pricing for gasoline, but it didn’t seem to have much effect. The report noted, “Certain areas of the state that had relatively high retail prices before the law took effect in 2008, such as the South Fork of Long Island and northern Westchester, still tend to have relatively high prices.”

The problem, according to the AG’s report, is that the anti-zone pricing law prohibits only arbitrary price differences between different locations. (See New York’s General Business Law § 399-ee at 1 (m): “Zone pricing means the arbitrary price differences within the relevant geographic market.”) The report notes that wholesalers admit charging different prices to retailers in different locations, but say the price differences are not arbitrary because they are “based on business-related market and economic conditions such as operating costs, degree of competition, the specific location of a station, and other factors.”

The report says “the inclusion of the word ‘arbitrary’ in the definition of zone pricing renders the prohibition toothless.” The AG’s solution is to propose deletion of the word from the definition. Where the law now merely prohibits certain arbitrary price differences, the AG wishes to prohibit price differences. If the state legislature agrees, the law would then prohibit the use of all kinds of normal business-related reasoning in New York’s wholesale gasoline business.

The state legislature ought not to accept the AG’s recommendation, but rather ought to toss out the zone pricing ban.

As the AG’s report itself indicates, there is no evidence of any consumer harm from zone pricing. With zone pricing affluent consumers may pay a little higher price for gasoline than lower- and middle-class consumers, but there is no reason to expect consumer prices are higher on average due to zone pricing.  (As I put it back in November 2008, “anti-zone pricing legislation is essentially consumer protection for affluent customers unwilling to spend their time shopping around for lower prices”). The toothless zone pricing ban is apparently causing no harm either, so doing nothing would simply leave an empty law on the books.

On the other hand, prohibiting the charging of reasonable price differences by gasoline wholesalers in New York would serve to screw up the whole state’s wholesale gasoline market in an effort to keep customers in affluent areas from paying a few more pennies per gallon of gasoline. Seems like a too high price to pay.

 

[NOTE: The report also includes the AG's report on gasoline price movements in the state during 2011 and a discussion of price gouging. These other issues may be discussed here later this week.]

h1

Zone pricing ban proposal advances in Connecticut, zone price ban law in New York still not working

March 2, 2011

Michael Giberson

Gasoline consumers in well-off Fairfield County, CT, pay gasoline prices that tend to be higher than prices in the rest of the state. The consumers don’t like it.

State legislators representing the region believe the issue is “zone pricing,” a practice by gasoline wholesalers which sets wholesale prices to different levels in different areas based on beliefs about how much consumers are willing to pay. These legislators are proposing to ban zone pricing in Connecticut.

Meanwhile, in New York, a law banning zone pricing went into effect about 2 1/2 years ago. It hasn’t had a noticeable effect on gasoline prices. (See WHAM-ABC 13: “Zone Pricing Law – Why it Didn’t Work.”)

Insight from economics: zone pricing may affect whether retailers or wholesalers capture a larger share of the profit, but a zone pricing ban probably won’t have much affect on retail prices. If the law has an effect, it will tend to raise prices in lower-income areas at least as much as it lowers prices in higher-income areas.

Question for proponent of a zone pricing ban: why do you think your law will succeed where a very similar New York law has failed?

NOTES:

  1. Current text of committee bill.
  2. More info from the CT General Assembly.
  3. Editorial from the Fairfield County-based Connecticut Post.
h1

An act purporting to ban gasoline zone pricing in Connecticut

January 24, 2011

Michael Giberson

A new legislative session in Connecticut brings with it another bill proposing to ban zone pricing of gasoline in the state. But the simplicity of the proposed bill makes it look like they’re not really trying.  Here is the body of the bill (all of it):

AN ACT BANNING GASOLINE ZONE PRICING.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to ban the wholesale pricing of gasoline based on a service station’s geographic location.

Statement of Purpose:

To ban the wholesale pricing of gasoline based on a service station’s geographic location.

Would it remain legal to price wholesale gasoline based upon the expected willingness-to-pay of a service station’s customer base?

(And if the wholesaler doesn’t price based upon an estimate of a station’s customers willingness-to-pay, will anything in Connecticut law prevent the station owner from setting retail prices based on what they think customers will pay? And assuming that question is answered in the negative, then isn’t it clear that the proposal is an attempt to give gasoline retailers what they want, not some sort of consumer protection?)

It isn’t surprising that the two sponsors of the bill (Rep. Tong, 147th District, and Rep. Fox, 146th District) are from the relatively-high-gasoline-price Stamford area. Maybe they even think that gasoline prices will be lower for their constituents if their bill became law. They should check in with New York to see how that state’s now-2-year-old zone pricing ban is going.

NOTE: More zone pricing posts here at KP.

h1

New York assembly candidate proposes to *really* ban zone pricing this time

September 7, 2010

Michael Giberson

From Politics on the Hudson:

Kaplowitz takes on Big Oil, says stronger ban on zone gasoline pricing could create a $1.3 billion “tax break” for New Yorkers.

At a news conference today at 12:30 at the Shell Station in Bedford on the corner of Rt. 22 and Rt. 172, State Senate candidate Mike Kaplowitz called for new laws to strengthen the state’s newly enacted but ineffective ban on zone pricing.

Statement by Mike Kaplowitz:

“Beginning in 2003, I strongly pushed for a state ban on “Zone Pricing” – the practice by big oil companies of charging different wholesale prices to retail stations for the same gasoline based on location.  Under zone pricing, price is not based on the cost of the commodity itself nor based on laws of supply and demand.  Instead, the marketplace is grossly manipulated by big oil.

In fall of 2008, we succeeded in getting the legislature to enact a law intended to end zone pricing of gasoline to wholesalers.  Unfortunately, the new law has had only limited effect, and zone pricing remains widespread in New York State.

(See related reports MidHudsonNews.com and NCNLocal.com).

It seems to be true that “the new law has had only limited effect.” At least it is the case that New York retail gasoline prices didn’t seem to change much relative to prices in New Jersey, when looking before and after the November 2008 implementation of the partial zone pricing ban. A colleague and I have examined retail price and margin data for 8,000+ stations in the two states for approximately six months before and after the law. A short summary is: no obvious change in pricing patterns due to the law.

As Kaplowitz notes in his statement, not all stations were directly affected by the ban as it applied only to wholesalers selling and distributing directly to retailers – not to vertically integrated firms owning refineries and retail stores, and not to retailers who purchased directly from refineries. It would be interesting to see whether the law has had any affect on the relative market shares of retailers buying at wholesale compared to retailers buying directly from refiners or retailers vertically integrated with refiners.

It also is true that most economists believe that zone pricing does not on average raise prices to consumers, and may allow lower prices in some areas. Zone pricing is just a form of price discrimination that relies on a geographic basis for segmenting customers. It is true that zone prices will strike some consumers as unfair, but also true – contrary to Mr. Kaplowitz’s claim – that price discrimination simply reflects the forces of supply and demand in the marketplace.

A complete ban on zone pricing may simply raise some consumers’ prices and lower other consumers’ prices.  Since zone prices likely raise prices in wealthier locales and reduce them in lower-income areas, a ban on zone pricing would tend to benefit wealthier consumers at the expense of poorer consumers.

(Which is why it is no surprise that Kaplowitz is campaigning against zone pricing in Westchester County, New York – one of the state’s wealthiest areas. The state senator who sponsored the 2008 law was from the suburbs of Rochester, another area with higher than average incomes.  Note that zone pricing is also often a political issue in Fairfield County, Connecticut, another wealthy area worried about having relatively higher gasoline prices.)

NOTE: this search will find the many previous Knowledge Problem posts on “zone pricing.”

h1

Girl Scout cookie price gouging?

March 2, 2010

Michael Giberson

Michael Finney observes that Girl Scout cookies sell at different prices in different locations, and he asks (tongue in cheek), is it “Girl Scout cookie price gouging?”

No, actually it is more like zone pricing price discrimination – setting the price to a level that the local market will bear.

(EDITED, see comments for explanation).

h1

New York politicians want to expand zone pricing ban to protect wealthy customers from slightly higher prices

October 5, 2009

Michael Giberson

From Newsday:

Two Nassau County legislators Thursday called on the State Senate to join the Assembly in extending the ban on zone pricing for gasoline, which they said unfairly charges more in well-to-do communities than in those less so.

For readers not up on their New York geography, Nassau County is the portion of Long Island closest to New York City.  The county ranks 10th in the nation and second in New York in median income, so generally speaking we are dealing with a relatively well-off bunch of consumers.  The Nassau County legislators are supporting the bill for the same reason that state legislators in wealthy Fairfield County in Connecticut support a zone pricing ban: they want gasoline prices in their neighborhoods to be made closer to the gasoline prices in lower-income neighborhoods.

A gas station owner quoted in the Newsday story said the extended ban would “end a discriminatory practice and benefit all members of the community,” but it is easy to see that if the high-end prices get a little lower and the low-end prices get a little higher, the not “all members of the community” are benefited.  Rather, the law may just raise prices to low-income consumers in order to give the pretense of providing “consumer protection” to high-income consumers.

h1

New York’s zone pricing ban not eliminating retail gasoline price differences

September 30, 2009

Michael Giberson

At least some retail gasoline consumers in New York expected that the zone pricing ban implemented last year would tend to equalize retail gasoline prices in an area. Rochester TV station WHEC discovers that a year after the law was signed by the governor, and about 10 months after the zone pricing law went into effect, that gasoline prices in suburban Rochester still vary substantially. WHEC reports that consumers don’t like the price variations and believe the law is not working as intended.

The problem, according to Bill Adams, who owns two area stations and represents the state retail gasoline dealers association, is that the law passed last year applies only to middlemen who buy from refiners and sell to retail stations. The law does not apply to refiners distributing gasoline to affiliated retailers, nor to retail stations that buy directly from refiners. The New York state assembly has passed an amendment to the law that attempts to cover this gap, which the governor says he will sign, but the New York state senate has not acted on the law.

Of course retail gasoline stations remain relatively free to set their own prices, and would continue to have the freedom under the proposed amendment.  Even if the state can limit the pricing flexibility still enjoyed by some middlemen, there is no guarantee that the changes will eliminate price differences within a region, and no reason to believe it would.

(SEE ALSO: Earlier zone pricing posts at Knowledge Problem.)

h1

Retailing gasoline: At least twice a day Dan checks up on his competition

July 27, 2009

Michael Giberson

An article from the San Bernardino, CA, The Sun offers a glimpse at the retail gasoline world from the retailers point of view: checking up on the competition twice a day, worried about being a penny or two too high in price, the pluses and minuses of accepting credit cards, negotiating with his wholesale distributor over the cost of gasoline.  Better than your average newspaper story.

h1

Nine months after the zone pricing ban in New York…

July 20, 2009

Michael Giberson

New York banned “zone pricing” of gasoline as of last November. In the news:

(Henrietta, N.Y.) – Nine months after a state law banning zone pricing for gas went into effect, drivers can still find about a 20 cent per gallon disparity in price depending on where they buy it.

For example, gas at the Kwik Fill in Henrietta is $2.51 a gallon–18 cents less than at the Kwik Fill in Greece. …

New York State Senator Jim Alesi (R), of Fairport, wrote that law. He suspects wholesale suppliers and he’s already proposed an amendment to include them in a new law.

“We have to include the wholesalers in this, because as long as the wholesalers are not included in this then they can still engage in zone pricing,” he said.

Not sure what Sen. Alesi is talking about. According to the text of the law, it only applies to wholesalers. (To wit: “No wholesaler shall engage in zone pricing with respect to any motor fuel of like grade or quality.”)

Zone pricing has been discussed extensively here in the past (click to see posts). As previously noted, zone pricing is the practice of gasoline wholesalers setting prices for sale to gasoline retailers by area, based upon a projected ability of the area to support higher or lower prices. While practices vary by wholesaler, typically incomes in the area and the level of competition between retailers would be taken into account as wholesales select the price it wishes to charge.

Opponents of the practice, typically those gasoline retailers facing higher than average wholesale prices, claim that zone prices cause higher prices for consumers. Economic analysis tends to support the view that zone pricing raises some retail prices and reduces others, with no clear negative impact on consumer welfare. To the extent a zone pricing ban would affect prices, it would be expected to raise prices in lower-income areas and reduce prices in higher-income areas.

For this reason a zone pricing ban is sometimes considered “consumer protection for the affluent.”

h1

More on the FTC and Western New York Gasoline prices

July 14, 2009

Michael Giberson

Following up on the earlier post, a recent FTC document details the agency’s activities addressing the oil and gas industry during the first six months of 2009.

Of the investigation into gasoline prices in Western New York, the FTC said:

The Commission’s work involving oil and natural gas also includes the examination of possibly anticompetitive conduct by firms in these industries. A prominent example of this type of activity was the Commission’s investigation of gasoline prices in Western New York and Vermont that began during the fall of 2008. Alerted both by Congressional expressions of concern and by its own Gasoline and Diesel Price Monitoring Project (described in more detail, infra), the Commission conducted a detailed examination of the reasons for higher-than-expected gasoline prices in and around Buffalo and in Northern Vermont. Following a six-month investigation, the Commission found substantial evidence that the prices were unlikely to have been caused by law violations. In response to Members’ requests, the Commission also noted various possible proposals that have been raised in the public discussion on addressing concerns about gasoline prices.

So the FTC clearly states it has conducted an extensive, six-month investigation that “found substantial evidence that the prices were unlikely to have been caused by law violations,” but so far as I have been able to tell the end result was just a letter sent to a few members of Congress, not a publicly-released written report as called for by the interested members of Congress.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers