Electricity

Senate Bill S.498: Removing Barriers To Competition?

Lynne Kiesling Last week Senators Burr (NC), Landrieu (LA), and Lott (MS) introduced S.498, ?To provide for the expansion of electricity transmission networks in order to support competitive electricity markets, to ensure reliability of electric service, to modernize regulation and for other purposes.? The proposed bill is at best a tweak of the Federal Power …

Senate Bill S.498: Removing Barriers To Competition? Read More »

More On Last Week’s Cranky Electric Consumer

Lynne Kiesling Ken Malloy at the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets has written a rebuttal to Rebecca Smith’s Cranky Consumer column that I wrote about last week. Why don?t residential electric customers switch? Ms Smith?s story implies that it is variously stupid marketers, high electric prices, unwilling customers, or the policy of deregulation. …

More On Last Week’s Cranky Electric Consumer Read More »

Guest Post On Institutional Change: Ian Cook

Ian Cook [NOTE: Our anti-spam software does not like something in Ian’s comment, so he graciously gave his consent to post this as a guest post — ed.] Unfortunately, I don’t know much about the institutions specifically within the electric power industry, so I imagine this will be of limited help. But, that’s never really …

Guest Post On Institutional Change: Ian Cook Read More »

Difficult Thinking About Institutional Change Iv: Use Rights, Rules, And Change Processes

Lynne Kiesling In my previous post about organic institutional change, I pondered Ostrom?s eight institutional design principles. She applies her analyses to common pool resources (CPRs). Are they also applicable to changing electricity regulation institutions? Obviously I suspect that the answer is ?yes? or I wouldn?t be putting us all through this. One of the …

Difficult Thinking About Institutional Change Iv: Use Rights, Rules, And Change Processes Read More »

New Senate Electricity Legislation: A New Hope?

Michael Giberson In considering Lynne?s note on the new Senate electricity legislation, I couldn?t help but notice that the co-sponsoring senators were not from states that have embraced “competitive energy markets” or done much to “modernize regulation.” Senator Burr is from North Carolina; Senator Cochran from Mississippi; Senator Landrieu from Louisiana; and Senator Lott, also …

New Senate Electricity Legislation: A New Hope? Read More »

New Senate Electricity Legislation

Lynne Kiesling Senators Burr, Cochran, Landrieu, and Lott (note the much-touted “bipartisanness”) have introduced a new piece of electricity legislation: S.498 Title: A bill to provide for expansion of electricity transmission networks in order to support competitive electricity markets, to ensure reliability of electric service, to modernize regulation and for other purposes. It starts off …

New Senate Electricity Legislation Read More »

The Cranky Consumer On Electricity “Deregulation”

Lynne Kiesling Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal had an installment in its regular series called “The Cranky Consumer”, in which one of the WSJ writers goes out into the market and reports on the consumer experience. Tuesday’s installment was written by Rebecca Smith, the Journal’s regular electricity writer and one of the best energy journalists around. …

The Cranky Consumer On Electricity “Deregulation” Read More »

Difficult Thinking About Institutional Change Iii: Ostrom’s Design Principles

Lynne Kiesling In my previous “thinking out loud” post on institutional change, I ended with this question: Institutional change is in many ways itself a constructivist exercise. Is there a way to make the process of institutional change more organic, and thus more likely to lead to “valuable, meaningful, forward-looking, robust, evolutionarily adaptive institutional change”? …

Difficult Thinking About Institutional Change Iii: Ostrom’s Design Principles Read More »