U.S. military aid funds tear gas used to repress peaceful protestors in Egypt

Lynne Kiesling

I am watching and following the events in Egypt with great interest. Of course as a technologist-of-sorts who studies complexity I am interested in the role of social media in enabling such a distributed movement to coalesce. Unlike what happened in Iran in June 2009, this uprising seems likely to have a longer-lasting impact on Egypt’s institutions.

The British journalists on Al Jazeera are asking about the domino effect and whether or not this will be the equivalent of 1989 and countries “throwing off the Soviet yoke”. Or will this bring a “meet the new boss, same as the old boss” switch from one authoritarian regime to another? The lessons of economics indicate that for the sake of the Egyptian people, their prosperity and well-being, and their living standards, institutional change that brings an increase in individual liberty.

There’s an important point relevant to U.S. policy and the economics and morality of our spending U.S. taxpayer dollars on military aid to such authoritarian regimes. We spend over $1 billion dollars on aid, including military aid, to Egypt. Today that authoritarian regime has turned its arms on its citizens who were protesting peacefully, including turning water cannons on people at prayer. Such aid has neither consequentialist nor moral economic foundations, should never have existed, and certainly should not continue.

Some in the media are starting to see this, although in today’s press conference no one pressed Robert Gibbs enough on this. CNN’s Ben Wederman is on the ground in Cairo, and sent this tweet:

Teenager showed me teargas canister “made in USA”. Saw the same thing in Tunisia. Time to reconsider US exports?

As the kids say these days, peace out.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “U.S. military aid funds tear gas used to repress peaceful protestors in Egypt

  1. As I recall, much of that $1 Billion comes in the form of a coalition military exercise called “Bright Star”. (Not sure if that uses any tear gas.) I believe “Bright Star” was one of the incentives used to acquire peace between Egypt and Isreal at the Camp David accords.

    Finally, how do we know that tear gas was not purchased, rather than a grant of aid? Perhaps we should be incredulous that the USA still manufactures SOMETHING…even if it is only teargas.

Comments are closed.